Hey {{ck:_first_name|there}},

I ran a small experiment.

For 30 days, I split my CTAs into two types.

Some ended with a link.

Some ended with "reply LEADS" or "reply COHORT."

Then I counted the replies.

Here are the numbers

Keyword CTAs: 7 issues, 5 got replies. 71%.
Link CTAs: 5 issues, 2 got replies. 40%.

But here's the real finding.

Every single keyword reply was intentional. Someone read "reply LEADS" and did exactly that.

The 2 replies on link-CTA issues had nothing to do with the link.

One person asked for a call.
Another disagreed with the post.

Neither clicked anything.

So the TRUE difference wasn’t 71% vs 40%.

It's 5 intentional replies vs 0.

Why I think keyword replies are better

A link asks for a click.

A keyword asks for a conversation.

Clicking is passive. (I know it gets your CTR higher!)

But replying is a commitment.

When someone types "LEADS" back to you, they've already decided they're interested.

They’re warmer leads than just a curious clicker.

What I'm doing differently

More keyword CTAs. Fewer plain links.

Not because links don't work. But because replies build actual relationships.

Every reply is a conversation I get to have personally. Every click is just a number in a dashboard.

📌 That’s why I’m going to run a webinar to show you how I get leads for my consulting business. If you want to get in on the waitlist, just comment “WEBINAR”.

I’ll add you to it.

— Justin

Hello, human!

Reply

Avatar

or to participate